Common questions on Calvinism ... part four

-

I recently received a series of questions from a good friend dealing with some issues/objections she had with Calvinism/Reformed Theology. I truly appreciated the opportunity to share what I explicitly believe in the realm of the Doctrines of Grace with her, and humbled she came to me to know how a Calvinist deals with each of these questions. This is a continuation of this series.

Because these questions are quite common inquires into Reformed Theology, I figured it would be profitable to the body of Christ for me to post my answers here as well. Perhaps I will continue on beyond her questions in writing on/replying to other objections common to Calvinism. Again, I hope this is useful to all who read this.

Question #4:
Who would be more loving - someone who chooses to be with you because that person loves you, or someone who is forced to be with you?

I am fairly familiar with this question, though in a different way: the "divine rapist" argument. I would state this is far from a genuine description of the Calvinist argument. I say "divine rapist" because famed apologist Norman Geisler says Calvinism turns God into a "divine rapist," forcing himself upon people who did not choose him of their own free will. It would seem, from this argument, that the one who chooses to love and serve the lover "of their own free will" is happier than the one who is forced by a kind of rape into the relationship. I kindly reject this notion.

I pose another, perhaps more biblical question.

A blind man is walking toward the edge of a cliff. You plead with him to stop... to turn around... to REPENT, as it were. He refuses. He continues walking. Is it then LOVING for the man who sees the danger to say "Okay... you made your choice of your own free will... I offered love, but you didn't take it. Enjoy"?? Would the person, falling to his death from the edge of the cliff, say of the one who just let him make the choice to fall "well, surely THAT was the LOVING thing to do, rather than actually save me"??

Or would Pastor Mark Driscoll have been loving if he had allowed his infant daughter to exercise her will over and above his? Please please watch.


As to the notion of "free will" of the blind man... I offer this up...






Jump to...
Part One
Part Two
Part Three

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mere Arminianism – Free Will, Predestination, and CS Lewis – Part One

-
Image
“ My toaster doesn’t have a love button! ” “No! And neither does a robot!” [1] This exchange, neither written nor uttered by C.S. Lewis, certainly represents his theology concerning the notions of God’s sovereign decree in election and of man’s autonomous will to freely choose God. Discussions concerning the freedom of the will, and by contrast divine election, are visible throughout Lewis’ writings - from his fictional works to his BBC broadcast-inspired theological Mere Christianity. In his unpublished paper To Choose or Be Chosen: C.S. Lewis’ Contribution to Free Will and Predestination , Georgian pastor John Alexander attempted “to reconcile predestination and free will through Lewis’ works and examine Lewis’ impact on modern Christianity through this reconciliation.” [2] Such “reconciliation,” however, is not necessary to understand the impacts of both Reformed Theology and C.S. Lewis’ theology on Christendom as a whole. Lewis’ relevant writings clearly point to a synerg...
Read more

Thought Police Strike Again...

-
Image
Current mood: pessimistic Brazil judge in gay football row By Gary Duffy BBC News, Sao Paulo A Brazilian judge faces legal action for homophobia after giving a judgment in which he said football was a masculine sport, not a homosexual one. The judge is reported to have said no-one who had watched the golden era of Pele and others in the 1970s could ever consider having a homosexual idol. His comments emerged in a case brought by Brazilian footballer Richarlyson. Richarlyson, who plays for Sao Paulo, was named on national TV as a gay player by the manager of another team. The suggestion that a leading Brazilian footballer was gay had already been the subject of considerable public speculation. Richarlyson started...
Read more

Faith + Works of the Law = Severed from Christ (A look @ Galatians 5, its meaning in context, and how the TNIV/NIV muddies the meanings yet again)

-
Image
The more and more I try to like the TNIV, the more and more I find that I dislike it.  And the more I discover I dislike it, the more I realize that my disdain is not limited merely to the TNIV… but extends to the Evangelical’s favored version: the NIV. A while back, I published a brief article on one of the many reasons someone should avoid (or rather use with caution) Today’s New International Version.  After I hit the PUBLISH button, I thought I should double-check and see if the same translation error made in the TNIV was present in the NIV.  It was.  So today when I encountered yet another translation biff, I decided to check in advance.  And guess what – it was poorly translated both in the TNIV and NIV.  At least I know in advance.  Now once again, I am not accusing anyone who uses the NIV (or even the TNIV) of being a heretic.  It is, after all, a translation of God’s Word.  Neither the NIV nor the TNIV are among the absolute WORST...
Read more