On Bible Translation Preferences

-
Here is the preference of my English Bible translations... hopefully in some accurate order:

1) English Standard Version (ESV) - Highly accurate yet easily readable.  Recommended by John Piper, Mark Driscoll, Joshua Harris, etc.

2) New King James Version (NKJV) - Revision of the King James, yet some language has been eased over to make it more accessible. 

3) New American Standard Bible (NASB) - VERY strict translation from the original language to the English language.  The problem may occur, however, when some of the meaning may get lost in the translation itself, due to the rigid translation of words.

4)  Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) - Slightly loser than ESV, but still very accurate.  If I remember correctly, this is a publication of LifeWay - the publishing and retail arm of the Southern Baptists.

5) New International Version (NIV) - Most read English translation today and has been for several years.  It is more of a functional or meaning-driven text, and some of the passages I depend on to be translated clearly for my discussion of reformed theology are glossed over in delivering a meaning that sometimes seems to try to pander to a wider Evangelical range of audience.  Still can be useful for devotional times... but not necessarily serious Bible study.

This is probably to be understood though as more... idealistic.  Why?  I do not own so many translations myself.  What versions do I physically have?  Several ESVs, an NIV Study Bible, and a paperback outreach TNIV I got for free before it was released from Biblica... as well as an NRSV only because I found it in a book recycling bin at the end of the school year, and I figured I should have one, as my school uses the NRSV as their Bible translation.

 For whatever reason... I am fascinated by the TNIV.  No, it is not the most accurate version.  However I do find myself drawn to it first if there is a passage that is somewhat confusing in the ESV.  It is about as loosey-goosey of a version I will use - I won't touch the Message or NLT or CEV or anything like that unless I have to... but they are not reliable enough for me to use or recommend using.

Truthfully there are problems with all English versions... but I would recommend the ESV for a very accurate yet readable version.  Still, keeping that NIV around to compare confusing passages is not a bad idea either.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Faith + Works of the Law = Severed from Christ (A look @ Galatians 5, its meaning in context, and how the TNIV/NIV muddies the meanings yet again)

-
Image
The more and more I try to like the TNIV, the more and more I find that I dislike it.  And the more I discover I dislike it, the more I realize that my disdain is not limited merely to the TNIV… but extends to the Evangelical’s favored version: the NIV. A while back, I published a brief article on one of the many reasons someone should avoid (or rather use with caution) Today’s New International Version.  After I hit the PUBLISH button, I thought I should double-check and see if the same translation error made in the TNIV was present in the NIV.  It was.  So today when I encountered yet another translation biff, I decided to check in advance.  And guess what – it was poorly translated both in the TNIV and NIV.  At least I know in advance.  Now once again, I am not accusing anyone who uses the NIV (or even the TNIV) of being a heretic.  It is, after all, a translation of God’s Word.  Neither the NIV nor the TNIV are among the absolute WORST Bible versions offered today (and I pray th
Read more

Thought Police Strike Again...

-
Image
Current mood: pessimistic Brazil judge in gay football row By Gary Duffy BBC News, Sao Paulo A Brazilian judge faces legal action for homophobia after giving a judgment in which he said football was a masculine sport, not a homosexual one. The judge is reported to have said no-one who had watched the golden era of Pele and others in the 1970s could ever consider having a homosexual idol. His comments emerged in a case brought by Brazilian footballer Richarlyson. Richarlyson, who plays for Sao Paulo, was named on national TV as a gay player by the manager of another team. The suggestion that a leading Brazilian footballer was gay had already been the subject of considerable public speculation. Richarlyson started
Read more

Mere Arminianism – Free Will, Predestination, and CS Lewis – Part One

-
Image
“ My toaster doesn’t have a love button! ” “No! And neither does a robot!” [1] This exchange, neither written nor uttered by C.S. Lewis, certainly represents his theology concerning the notions of God’s sovereign decree in election and of man’s autonomous will to freely choose God. Discussions concerning the freedom of the will, and by contrast divine election, are visible throughout Lewis’ writings - from his fictional works to his BBC broadcast-inspired theological Mere Christianity. In his unpublished paper To Choose or Be Chosen: C.S. Lewis’ Contribution to Free Will and Predestination , Georgian pastor John Alexander attempted “to reconcile predestination and free will through Lewis’ works and examine Lewis’ impact on modern Christianity through this reconciliation.” [2] Such “reconciliation,” however, is not necessary to understand the impacts of both Reformed Theology and C.S. Lewis’ theology on Christendom as a whole. Lewis’ relevant writings clearly point to a synerg
Read more