Levitical Law and Homosexuality

Current mood: peaceful

I have noticed a lot within the secular Gay-Pride movement, the "Gay Christian" Movement, and within liberalism in general, the trend of believing that Old Testament Levitical laws are no longer useful to us Christians in the 20th century and should be ignored all together.

I am going to "pick on" two verses in Leviticus that explicitly spell out that homosexuality is indeed sinful behavior before a Holy God.

Lev 18:22 (ESV): You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

Lev 20:13 (ESV): If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

I just read a friend's blog concerning Levitical Laws... she seemed to be snidely implying that laws against homosexuality in Leviticus are along the same lines of offense to us today as wearing a shirt that is a cotton-polyester mix (Lev 19:19), for whatever value that may be of today.

This is a common error unfortunately, and many Christians do not know of how to respond to this assertion. However, just today I was reading in Joe Dallas' The Gay Gospel? about this VERY SUBJECT! I'm convinced it was a "God thing" that I read today the portion that I would need to address Steph's assertions with. Anyway... I'm borrowing HEAVILY from the book, pgs 184-186:

----------------------------------

Those opposed to the biblical view of gay behavior (identifying it as sin) claim that those of us who pick out these particular verses in the OT and use it to oppose "gay marriage" (or whatever) are picking and choosing what OT law we want to hang on to. This, however, is not the case. It isn't a matter of picking and choosing, but rather looking at scripture as a whole. Christians must recognize three things about the OT Law:

1) The Law is good. We as believers are not under the Law, and in fact, cannot keep it no matter how hard we may try. Nonetheless, the Law itself is good, and the New Testament in no way nullifies it. Check out Romans 7:12, Galatians 3:24, and Matthew 5:17... the NT clearly agrees that the Law is perfect, just, and good.

2) The New Testament clarifies portions of the Law that are no longer binding to the Christian. When portions of the Law are specifically mentioned in the NT as no longer binding, then we are no longer obligated to keep them. Again, this is not "picking and choosing," but looking at the Holy Word of God as a whole. So for example, when Hebrews 12 tells us that we are not bound to sacrifice animals to atone for sin, because Christ's sacrifice on the cross is sufficient, we are NOT ignoring the Law's earlier commandments to make sacrifice. We're simply recognizing that the final sacrifice has been made--so the verses commanding the sacrifice are no longer binding. The same can be said of dietary and ceremonial laws, which were binding to Israel but are not to modern Christian believers, according to Galatians 3:10-13

3) Some commandments are contained in the Law; some also transcend the Law. In Lev 18 and 20, incest, bestiality, adultery, and homosexuality are all prohibited. And these prohibitions are repeated in the NT as well, making them not only a part of the Law, but the broader biblical ethic as well. In fact, according to Leviticus 18:27, all the abominations practiced and prohibited in this chapter (adultery, homosexuality, incest, and bestiality) defiled the land when they were committed by the land's inhabitants. God also stated He "detested" (NIV and KJV both say "abhorred") the people who inhabited the land before Israel did because they practiced these behaviors (Leviticus 20:23). Clearly these practices offended God no matter WHO practiced them, or in what context. In other words, there are some commandments contained in the Law that are not binding to believers; others are both contained in the Law and also transcend the Law.

The commandment to love God, for example, is spelled out in the Law, but it is repeated throughout both Testaments as well. The same is true of the commandments to love one's neighbor, speak the truth, and deal justly with all people. Although these rules are contained in the Law, they're also stressed in the Gospels, the epistles, and the books of wisdom and poetry.

If the commandment to abstain from any form of homosexual behavior was a minor technicality only applicable to Israel during a specified point in history [such as, Steph, your "discovery" that wearing a cotton/polyester mixed tee-shirt is a sin, etc], then it would hardly be worth our attention today. But when a commandment is contained within the Law, then repeated and reiterated throughout Scripture, then it is binding not only today, it is also binding to all.

----------------------------------

There is a huge difference between stoning someone (referring to "Let him who is without sin, throw the first stone" in John 8:7) and pointing out sin and calling the individual to repentance (1 Cor 5). If not, I guess Paul would be guilty of stone-throwing, eh? I mean shoot... he commanded the church to disassociate themselves with a member of their church (someone claiming to be a Christian) who was proudly and openly engaging in sex with his step mother... to not even eat with the man, in hopes that he would turn from his sin and turn back to God.

And let's remember that in John 8, those who were to stone were setting the girl up. The Law called for the girl AND the man active in adultery to be stoned. The entire thing was staged as a way to get Jesus to screw up. But Jesus knew what was going on (After all, he IS God!) and was many steps ahead. ... but i digress.

It is not wrong to point out to someone that he/she is a sinner. What kind of gospel is there if this is not the case? If someone is not informed of their sin, be it homosexuality, bestiality, idolatry, lust, etc, how can he/she repent of that sin? What reason would that person have for turning from the. old sinful nature and beginning a new life (2 Cor 5:17)? Speak the truth--the gospel, in love.

<><

Currently listening :
Portable Sounds
By Tobymac
Release date: By 20 February, 2007

Comments

  1. can you differeniate between homosexual orientation and homosexual acts? Because to act out your orientation is a sin, that is quite apparant, but just as you can't help be attracted to women, some men cant' help being attracted to men. How do you act that out? If your religion told you that you had to be with a man, how do you get past that, cause it probably seems kinda gross to you. I mean, let's stop identifying the issue, and live out the implications. Okay, they're wrong, we get it, how do we love them and show them Christ's love. How do we teach them that they must live celebate when they think they'll be much happier with a same sex mate?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1) there is nothing to indicate a person is born gay. all of those "studies" are inconclusive and it cannot be determined of that part of the brain in gay men is different then straight ones CAUSED them to be gay or is BECAUSE they are gay.

    2) Christianity is not like other religions-- it is first and foremost a relationship. Secondly, it is the only right way. John 14:6 So I don't really feel the need to go on and describe why my religion would not require me to sin.

    3) You say to stop identifying the issue? No. not happening, especially when so many "Christians" claim it is okay to be christian and a practicing homosexual.

    4) you are operating under the false assumption that Christ does not have the power to free a homosexual of his sin and his attraction to the same sex.

    5) how do we teach them? no use in doing so really unless they are transformed by the renewing power of Christ. otherwise we are attacking a symptom not the problem-- being enslaved to sin and hatting God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 4) you are operating under the false assumption that Christ does not have the power to free a homosexual of his sin and his attraction to the same sex.

    WOW, a man of God as yourself to say something like that. How can you accuse a fellow christian of not believing that Christ has the power to free someone of their sin. Love each other, for Christ's sake! a poor confused 13 year old is being beat over the head with tbe bible by people like you because he's attracted to other boys. All i'm saying is that instead of telling them over and over how wrong they are, let's focus on ways to show Christ's love! Let's stop attacking each other, like you telling me what i do and do not believe, and love those who have not yet felt Christ's love in their live. When you say something so offensive, like you did to me, it turns people away from what they assosicate you with.. and in many cases it might be Christ. If you don't agree with what i have to say, don't attack my beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i never meant to attack you personally courtney. perhaps I should have said "you seem to be operating..."

    again, i consider the loving thing to do is to pray for them, counsel them and keeping them accountable to the Word and to God so they may not fall into temptation. And speaking truth to them as well. Should we abandon truth of scripture because it may step on some toes?

    You seem to be asking questions about how we should show them love, and I see no answers being presented. So my question to you is-- what is your point? do YOU have any suggestions?

    Forgive me for seeming blunt... it just appears you expect me to ignore what the Bible says about homosexual sin.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Faith + Works of the Law = Severed from Christ (A look @ Galatians 5, its meaning in context, and how the TNIV/NIV muddies the meanings yet again)

Thought Police Strike Again...

Mere Arminianism – Free Will, Predestination, and CS Lewis – Part One